It happens to all of us. We go to a wonderful conference; we see a great webinar; we read an important article – and then we plan to change the conversation with referral sources and clients. So, when the inevitable challenges of our personal and professional reality comes in, we end up singing the same old songs of wealth, estate tax, financial, and asset protection planning – thinking months later, where did the change in conversation go? Successful practitioners explain to us that the way their practice found stability and growth was through finding planning that they could execute on,…
An Evidence-Based Approach to Investing
Download Printable Article By Jason Oshins, Financial Advisor, MBA Evidence-based medicine is defined as “the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients.”[1] If possible, wouldn’t it be prudent to approach investing similarly? Wouldn’t it make sense to apply the concepts developed by Nobel Laureates? Well, you can. Philosopher Alfred A. Montapert famously said, “Do not confuse motion and progress.” Motion also creates the illusion of control. An excellent example of this is in the investment world. Wall Street perpetuates the notion that successful investing requires stock picking and market…
Are You Aware Decanting Causes Tax Issues?
Download Printable Article By Robert S. Keebler, CPA/PFS, MST, AEP (Distinguished), CGMA Decanting is the act of distributing the assets of an old trust to a new one with more favorable terms. It provides an easy, inexpensive method for correcting errors or ambiguities, adapting a trust to changes in a settlor’s objectives or changes in a beneficiary’s circumstances, taking advantage of new planning opportunities or adding flexibility to a trust. However, because trust decanting is a relatively new estate planning strategy, its tax consequences have not yet been clearly established. The IRS is considering ways to address these tax consequences…
Keep Your E-Mail Inbox Under Control (or It Will Control You!)
Download Printable Article By Megan DeLaGarza, Executive Assistant Technology is a concurrent blessing and curse. Email has not been around terribly long in the grand scheme of office administration, so we are just now learning the effects of it’s omnipresence in a plugged in world. The biggest problem with email is that it’s a huge distraction. The pressure to respond right away leads you to working off-task. An inbox that is open with notifications popping up makes this even worse. Responding to your inbox as a to-do list leads to working on the wrong priorities. It’s time to break these…
TODAY ONLY! – – Special St. Patrick’s Day Sale
SORRY, YOU MISSED IT! ST. PATRICK’S DAY WAS ON MARCH 17th! Sorry that you missed out on saving 25% off everything* on our website. We are happy to let you know that you can still save 15% by utilizing the coupon code LUCKY15, which is good through April 17, 2015. Some of the products that you can apply this discount to include, but are not limited to: Upcoming Teleconferences – Save on your registration to any upcoming educational programs* All passed teleconferences in our On-Demand Library – This is a great way for you to take advantage of huge savings…
ABA Heckerling Reports from the 2015 Heckerling Institute
Every January, The University of Miami School of Law sponsors one of the nation’s largest estate planning conferences, The Heckerling Institute on Estate Planning. Also, for the past 16 years, the American Bar Association Section of Real Property, Trust and Estate Law with the permission of the University of Miami School of Law, releases several extensive reports highlighting the various lectures and proceedings of the Heckerling Institute. To view, download and access these extensive reports, please visit: http://www.americanbar.org/groups/real_property_trust_estate/events_cle/heckerling_reports/heckerling_2015.html Further, at the above website, you can also access reports from prior Heckerling Institutes as well. We, at The Ultimate Estate Planner,…
BREAKING NEWS: Important Updates from Robert Keebler
Thanks to the generosity of Stephan Leimberg and Leimberg Information Services, we are pleased to bring to you complimentary podcasts on the following important updates. IRS Approves Extension of Time to Recharacterize a Roth IRA The IRS has published Private Letter Ruling 201506015, in which they have granted the taxpayer an extension of time to recharacterize a Roth IRA. The taxpayer had learned that the account value had declined due to fraud by an investment manager after the deadline for recharacterizing had passed. To listen to these complimentary podcast, see below: The Administration’s 2016 Budget Proposals The Administration has released…
Decanting an Irrevocable Trust – The Process
Download Printable Article By Steven J. Oshins Esq., AEP (Distinguished) Our clients often set up and fund an irrevocable trust and then come back to us wanting to change the trust terms. This even sometimes happens within a matter of days of funding the trust. Human nature is such that people often change their minds. And it is also likely that circumstances will change after the trust has been funded. We also often review our clients’ and prospects’ existing trusts and find that they weren’t drafted very well. Just as our clients often want to change their irrevocable trusts, advisors…
Robert Keebler Podcasts on 2016 Budget Proposals
Reproduced with Permission by and Courtesy of Leimberg Information Services, Inc. (LISI). For information about how to subscribe to LISI, click here. Nationally renowned CPA and tax planning expert, Robert S. Keebler, CPA/PFS, MST, AEP (Distinguished), CGMA, recently produced three podcasts with commentary regarding the Administration’s 2016 Budget Proposals. To listen to these complimentary podcasts, see below: © Copyright 2015. Reproduction in Any Form or Forwarding to Any Person Prohibited – Without Express Permission.
Dahl v. Dahl: Utah Supreme Court Rules Trust Not a Domestic Asset Protection Trust!
Reproduced with Permission by and Courtesy of Leimberg Information Services, Inc. (LISI). For information about how to subscribe to LISI, click here. “The Court specifically uses the terms ‘strong public policy’ and ‘repugnant’ in their analysis. Query how they might have ruled had this been a defendant in a negligence action, for example, rather than it being a divorce matter. Would the Court still have applied Utah law under its ‘strong public policy’ and ‘repugnant’ requirements? It appears that the answer would be ‘no’ given this requirement that it be a ‘strong public policy’ and ‘repugnant,’ but this is far…